New option -suppressTailnetDialer, to help access off-tailnet addresses #11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t addresses This might help with reaching addresses on LANs outside my tailnet, but I'm not sure why.
antifuchs
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like upstreams on private VLANs on my network can't be reached via the tailscale dialer. Using the non-tailscale dialer to does allow tsnsrv to reach those machines.
To this end, PR adds a
-suppressTailnetDialer=trueflag, which will use the stdlibnet.Dialerto dial out, which can reach those upstreams. It's weird, but it works!